Ten promises ‘Masterchef-style makeover’ for Biggest Loser as buyers call for franchise innovation
Many of Australia’s top media buyers are pushing the major free-to-air television networks to be innovative in their 2015 tent-pole programming, ahead of the first round of upfronts this week.
The call comes after Mumbrella reported last week on the lacklustre ratings performance for many of the big event television programs this year, with franchises such as The Biggest Loser, The Voice, X Factor and My Kitchen Rules posting double digit declines in audiences.
In the wake of last week’s report, a Network Ten spokesman told Mumbrella that one of this year’s worst performers the Biggest Loser, which was down 42.30 per cent among people 16-54 in consolidated figures, would undergo a “Masterchef-style makeover” in 2015.
“The Biggest Loser Australia remains part of our portfolio,” said the Ten spokesman. “It will be given a Masterchef-style makeover and will return to Ten at some stage. MasterChef Australia’s audience was up 31 per cent this year vs 2013.”While all of the media buyers Mumbrella spoke to welcomed ‘the return to basics’ format that had seen Ten’s Masterchef perform strongly this year, many of them questioned if key franchises, in particular talent shows The Voice and X Factor, could be revived.
Change or die
Yes and the same fate awaits the revamp and the one after that.
Programming like this goes all out to satisfy the lowest common denominator, and increase the numbers. The technique is to spoon feed the masses as much sugar a they can eat. It is a mistake.
Light attracts moths, they fly into the light source in their thousands, until they collapse exhausted, or burn up in the heat. Mean time, the sugar eaters are getting sick spoon by spoon, and throwing up and drifting away.
The problem here is not that there isn’t anyone who knows what to do, for there is no perfect answer in the theatre world question “what should we produce to draw audiences?” The problem seems to be that there is nobody at Ten who doesn’t know what NOT to do.
You don’t have to know Aristotle to crack the secrets of theatre, but it very helpful to know what nearly always fails and what has caused audiences to run away in droves, or even to fluctuate dramatically.
One show makes a contest of preparing rich and wonderful food, the other makes a contest of denying food and losing weight . The facts are simple; there is a great and abiding joy associated with food and its preparation, where with losing weight, there may be plenty of desire, but there is more disappointment anguish and self loathing. Human beings are like this, they usually watch quiz shows to see contestants lose, but here the losers are the winners, and instead of why should he/she win all that money , it is a matter of why should that “so and so” lose weight when I can’t.
Soon depression sets in and they turn away from the pain. The show having failed miserably, someone at ten decides to combine the two. What? Take the non eating, exercising and losing weight show, and make it more like the popular cooking and feeding show?
What about breaking the chains of international franchising, and making your own successful television show, like the real producers do?
Hi Richard , not sure that I totally agree that “usually watch quiz shows to see contestants lose” I watch to be entertained and hopefully pick up a tip or two, I see no value in watching a group of people “marooned” some where to win a million dollars, but put them an contest to win tasks to zoom around the worlds or bake a cake, seems more worth while viewing. Then there are the presenters , Master Chef, Dancing with the Stars and Top Gear are three show which I think the presenters are on top of their game and somewhat educational, this has an enormous impact on the shows success.
Incidentally none of these show work with 14 minutes of paid TVC’s plus station promos. It is time that l media returns to proprietors rather than equity funds and billionaires who have already used the profits to fund other parts their empire.
How about The Biggest Winner? Six anorexics try to put on as much weight as possible in eight weeks. Sponsored by Maccas, KFC and Woolworths 85c white bread.
The advertisers would be ling up.
I’m no longer target market for any of these shows (and am sick to death of the dramatic promos…’it’s the BIGGEST EVER…’ ) but at a purely objective level, could it be that some of these formats are just wrong for Australian TV viewers?
When I lived in the UK it was easy to get sucked into following the X Factor & BGT because the bleak, cold winter nights made it a much easier choice to stay in and vege-out / tune out.
Here I think viewers have more choice at a lifestyle level – why keep feeding viewers tele-junk? Why can’t the networks try and raise the bar a few notches?
Hello Cris,
Yes it has been studied and documented that many like you watch quiz shows to learn and to be entertained, however of those who want contestants to win and those who want them to lose, most want the contestant to lose. They like them to win for a while, but the nearer they get to the grand prize, the more they wish them to fail.