The Age and SMH to go tabloid sized; 1900 redundancies; presses to be shut
Fairfax has announced a series of radical moves including The Age and The SMH moving to a compact size format, the closure of print works, the axing of 1,900 jobs and the introduction of paywalls for online content.
The two newspapers will move to a compact size format in nine months’ time. The leap comes more than five years after the company first weighed up a change of format. Another possibility would have been the midsized “Berliner” format used by the likes of The Guardian in the UK. However that was discounted partly because of the additional investment needed at the print works.
A key challenge the company will now face with the advertising market will be negotiations over ratecard for ads in the smaller size print edition.
The move is also a signal that the company is preparing for a time when the newspapers are no longer in print format, referring to moving the business “to a digital-only model if that is what is required in the future”.
Not tabloid, smaller though.
It’ll be tabloid quality when Gina gets her way!
about time – Finnally they understood that the size is a massive detractor.
this couldn’t come soon enough – finally papers that are easy to read & not awkward & flimsy…
I think it’s rather naive of Fairfax to believe and for its shareholders to swallow the conclusion that it’s 7m unique users per month for its digital formats will be retained once they head to paywalls. The NYTimes has had mixed success with this but there is no way they have retained anywhere near the level of readership they had prior to the introduction of the paywalls, so any of Fairfax’s projected digital revenues form their metro editions should be taken with a grain of salt.
This would have been a relevant & timely move in 2006
Bad news about the workers getting shafted at Chullora and Tullamarine, but good news for Fairfax, and particularly good news for readers who won’t have to put up with that idiotic broadsheet format any longer. Tabloid size? – great, not before bloody time!
@thumbelina http://goo.gl/MeMYO
I know I’m some sort of Luddite, but I love the broadsheet size. That said, it’s only really the news part that’s oversized; the sport, business etc have been tabloid for ages. Another thing to think about might be the over PC/leftist reporting (not that I’m saying to lurch the way of The Oz.) Take something like the refugee/boat people. A huge issue in the community at the moment which the SMH doesn’t seem to want to touch. Get rid of the selective reporting, please. We’re adults, we can handle it!
Unbelievable that it took them this long to make a change not only with the printed format but with the move to digital. A paywall is a sketchy move, plenty of news sites are successful without it. They would need to combine both The Age and SMH into one digital news source.
I actually prefer a broadsheet format DONE WELL, that is filled with news., without radical layout settings and fillers. Bigger pages with more to read on each page makes for a simpler read. Unfortunately, in this day and age, a newspaper’s main income is from adspace, and while the broadsheet model is great for delivering news, if you pepper the large spread with ads, try to ‘jazz it up with pictures and different article layouts, it makes it difficult to read.
Besides, seems we never get papers with news in it anymore anyway. On average, about 5 pages of domestic, 2 pages world, about the same number in sport, the necessary weather/tv/comics, and then plenty of ‘lifestyle’ filler. Yeah, thinking that way, the move to a tabloid size makes sense.
Wish we had a decent broadsheet paper in the style of old, just pages of text, some good photography (mind you, not file photos), and with good news coverage… then again, does that style of news journalism even exist anymore?
Sorry, but there is something really strange about this as breaking news. Shame on you Fairfax for taking so long to do the obvious. Hope you do the right thing by the people (PEOPLE) at Chullora and Tullamarine
I also love broadsheet.
I can’t make something add up: going paywall functionally reduces eyeballs by count. So, unless they can demonstrate $ return to adpeople for those eyes (ie, higher value) how can the paywall equate to improved advertising revenue?
ie, they face less eyes, declining revenue, and declining eyes-per-ad which reduces ad revenue. Isn’t this a vicious cycle?
to “great” & “thumbelina”. its about the content not the format, although by the sound of your comments, easy to read applies equally to both.
JC – there’s a reason that style of paper doesn’t exist any more. It doesn’t make money.
So what is the “Fairfax Printing Network”? I don’t have problems reading broadsheet and think the layout options better than with smaller pages. Obviously there is a skill in handling broadsheet on the train to work, and there the electronic editions appear popular. Personally I’m not very enthusiastic about reading on electronic media because generally screens are too small for quality presentation without clumsy formatting. But good for skimming, which perhaps is all many people do.
to “George” The idea behind the paywall is people will have to subscribe to access the news on the site. With the subscription, you get more personal information. So yes you will probably have fewer eyeballs but you will be able to more accurately target ad’s towards their audience. This means they can charge a higher rate and would mean less “wastage” in terms of client spend.
Will the new tabloid sized papers or redirecting the subediting offshore sacrifice the journalistic credibility which the SMH and Age deserve.
I noted a error on the front page of the SMH today. Reference the second paragraph of the article ‘Downer sniffed a bargain….’ Linton Besser has used “it’s” where the appropriate “its” should apply.
I hope it’s not a sign of things to come!!
where are they going to print them?
@ James … both the Fairfax and News Ltd papers are already littered with grammatical and spelling errors – and they were that way even before they chain-sawed their subbing desks. Their websites are even worse. But no one seems to care about that old foggy stuff any more. It’s all about the 24 hour news cycle and having a new sensation to splash on the screen every 10 minutes – “Lady Gaga Changes Her Hair Colour” … “Man Bites Dog” … blah blah blah. Anyway, isn’t the gossip out there that News is set to sack about a thousand, including 400 editorial staff? No wonder they’re not mouthing off too much today about poor old Fairfax’s misery.
So… apparently size does matter?
@Zumabeach, not a happy day for anyone involved….and on subbing, they’re publishing a lot of words a day, count the ones they get right…
As Australian news stops being “one of three” that you can buy in the newsagent’s shop and starts being “one of many” you can buy online, Fairfax’s only point of difference is content. Any news portal online that’s not doing a better job than the ABC’s free service won’t make any money.
The first question any institutional investor should be asking Fairfax’s strategists is “what are you doing to provide quality ‘niche’ content for the Victorian & NSW markets?” Maybe hiring experienced, quality writers?
The next thing they should do is insist Fairfax do more than just reprint AAP reports and spin doctor media releases that are available everywhere.
@Zumabeach
*fogey* 😉
I don’t know the “Robbo” who jumped on the line earlier in the day on the subject of the SMH, but it obviously wasn’t the original Robbo, because that’s me.
Not only that, I’m perfectly happy to have rotten tomatoes thrown at me by using my real name, not hiding in anonymity and getting me into trouble with my mates at the same time.
@Pete … I know they publish tens of thousands of words a day but in the not so distant past they got a lot more of them right than they do now. I’m not gloating about anyone losing their jobs. Newspapers were my working life for more than 40 years and I still love them. You want depth, you want scoops, you want stuff to make you think, you still find it in newspapers, with all their faults, and not on the internet where any dill – including this one – can be a critic. And you know what they say about critics: they’re like a certain part of the anatomy – everybody’s got one and everybody can be one. Anyway, I agree it’s a sad day for what was once a great industry and apparently there are more sad days to come as more good people are shown the door.
Could this be the birth of a thousand blogs? Mumbrella is awesome and I read it before I would read Media sections in Fairfax/News. I read Crikey and pay for it because it’s great insider info. I read a handful of food blogs before reading food sections in MSM. My food blogs are way better than anything Good Living does – more pics, friendlier voice, more affordable establishments. My take is this is the end of the duopoly of Fairfax/News and we’re going to see scores of new sites, new voices. Who cares what Gina Rinehart does at Fairfax, I’m reading Mumbrella/Crikey/Twitter – content sources that didn’t exist a decade ago.
Another step in the death of good journalism, 1900 staff cut, why don’t they get rid of the CEO at Fairfax instead of the workers who are all trying to survive. .
Carole, not only are they not going, they are adding to their numbers. Another exec starts in August.
http://www.bandt.com.au/news/m.....from-fox-s
Why dont people understand that Broadsheet newspapers ARE SMALLER AND EASIER TO READ ON THE TRAIN!
You fold them down the centre, creating a thin long paper that you read downwards. You then fold it around to read the next article. The Tabloid Newspapers are the ones that are too large. Think of yourself sitting on the train, and you have to open a tabloid newspaper wide and you take up either side of you. A properly folded broadsheet is 30 cm wide.
Broadsheet newspapers when folded correctly take up less than 30 CM. Fools.