The 457 visa ban is good for Australia and could fix our marketing skills gap
ADMA CEO Jodie Sangster believes its high time Australia’s visa program was overhauled. In this guest post, she argues dumping the out-of-date 457 could be exactly what the country needs to get its marketing skills up to scratch.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull took to Facebook to announce his government’s plans to abolish Australia’s 457 visa program for temporary skilled migrants. In his Facebook video, Turnbull promised to replace the 457 visa with a new temporary visa that will only allow the “best and brightest” to work in the country. In addition, he said applicants of the new visa would be put through a stringent and rigorous process.
While many aren’t too keen on Turnbull’s take on things, I actually see a positive spin to it and welcome this move by the government.
Ultimately, skilled migrants are absolutely critical to the future of the Australian economy, but the truth is that Australia’s current 457 visa regime is out-of-date and not on par with how quickly the world’s global economy is growing. The job roles under which people can apply are antiquated and not reflective of the current market requirements in terms of skills or roles. For example, there isn’t even a category to bring data analysts/ scientist into Australia – skills which are so sorely needed. There is little rigour to test and determine whether applicants demonstrate the skills required or whether they just duplicate skills that already exist in the Australian market. I cannot stress enough that this change needs to happen quickly.
I find it very difficult to trust anything this person says anymore, after her comments about Australia following the US lead on letting ISPs sell browser data.
You’ve lost all your integrity as an industry leader.
Agree! First they invite Trump’s data guy and now she talks like Trump too. Time to leave ADMA.
Its not a ban.
Its a re-brand.
“good way of tackling the Australian marketing industry’s skills gap issue.”
We hear this alot and its a broad sweeping statement. Is there gap at a time when marketing is a fluid, evolving craft and industry leaders and corporates either resist the change, don’t have the skills to manage the change or just ignore it. So is it a gap or a collective of “I don’t knows” with no idea what to hire…
Just sayin.
Why are we entitled because where we’re born?
What about a World without borders where we’re all people have equal opportunity.
I know Jodie is just playing devils advocate, but it’s not necessary when such a backward, bigotry motion is being moved to pass
It’s clear that you have no idea what was actually involved for the application process for a 457 visa, or indeed spoken to any 457 visa holders or sponsor companies. It was indeed a stringent and rigorous process to secure my visa, and actually quite stressful in terms of how much information was required to prove that I had a skillset to meet the requirements of the genuine position that I needed the visa for.
To clarify a few points in your article:
Moving forward, we need a program that:
• Has formal criteria against which to assess whether the skilled migrants are ‘skilled’ in the areas actually required by business. Therefore, a capabilities framework must be introduced so that applicants can be assessed against standards to ensure we are genuinely bringing in new talent to grow our economy; – We had to supply a significant amount of information to show that I was “skilled” and had the skillset actually required by the business. I was measured against formal criteria.
• Allows businesses to fill genuine gaps when they arise; This is exactly what the 457 allowed my company to do
• Encourages peer-to-peer learning so that skills are transferable and allows for growth as a country. As part of the 457 visa there is a significant training requirement by employers – ensuring that Australian citizens are trained and by having a 457 visa holder in place it significantly increases the opportunity for peer-to-peer learning for Australians from overseas citizens.
A lot of misinformed people are jumping on the 457 publicity wagon and it’s very frustrating for me as someone who’s actually had to go through the stringent process to see this kind of article being published.
An opinion piece or chance to spruik one’s own company?
This is rich.
Clickbait headline, misleading to what the opinion was trying to get at.
Read the original piece on Jodie’s LinkedIn and it made sense to point out the skills gap issue and the need for a 457 overhaul. Mumbrella, your headline and intro is sensationalising the issue and taking the message out of its context.