Bad enough the SMH iPad app is just a PDF, forcing a print subscription is insane
So yesterday Fairfax launched its Sydney Morning Herald iPad app. The strategy – designed to shore up print – and the execution – already derided by users as a “glorifed PDF reader” – are both laughable.
If there were ever doubts that Fairfax is two companies pulling in different directions, then the handling of the iPad app dispels them.
Promoted by the print division rather than by Fairfax Digital, it’s already been slammed by iTunes users with the average review 1.5 stars out of five.
We’ll come to grips with their gripes about the functionality in a moment.
Great story, Tim. Also, shows just how committed Fairfax are to killing trees… Even people who would rather not waste the paper are forced into wasting paper. (?)
The SMH app supplier is Newspaperdirect.com which has offered an app called ‘Press Reader’ to access global newspapers in this PDF format since 2009 and in May for the iPad – http://newspaperdirect.com/abo...../0505.aspx
Find the app here.
http://itunes.apple.com/au/app.....04711?mt=8
The app is fundamentally the exactly same (version and all) except it’s been locked to the SMH and had Top Stories functionality removed.
Up until recently the SMH was available in Press Reader. The Age still is still there as are most other Australian newspapers.
Tim, thankyou. You have just explained the missing link to me. I couldn’t understand why newspaper proprietors were missing the point of the digital age. Now I know – circulation of their print edition.
As an example, I woke up at around 8am today, grabbed the ipad from the bedside table and it’s now 10am. I’ve read The Weekend Australian (via PressReader), browsed my favorite tech websites via my RSS reader and generally enjoyed my Sat morning so far.
Why haven’t I read The West Australian yet? Because they don’t provide it for me to read (www.thewest.com.au is a joke) the way I want to. The stupid thing is, I would pay for it, but they won’t let me. So, I haven’t bought my (previously) normal daily copy since I bought my iPad. As a result, their figures will gob down.
Never mind, they’ll just provide free copies to Skywest like they normally do….
MediaSpy.org has comment from Fairfax – there is a digital publication on the way later this year – http://www.mediaspy.org/report.....app-store/
Calling the SMH app an “app” is an insult. Having to subscribe to the print version is a joke, and shows a complete lack of understanding ( or care ) of their audience.
Fairfax’s fundamental problem, as Tim points out, is that the Print division of the company has essentially taken over the Digital division – and this is the perfect example of their lack of understanding of technology and how to monetise it properly.
Secondly, the politics in that organisation are insane!
I’m not going to bother installing the app. I’ve gotten used to reading the website just fine on the iPad.
Unbelievable! The pricing strategy is mad and trying to cook the circulation figures like that will hopefully be seen for the ridiculous move it is.
I saw their (paper) Supplement, advertising The iPad App. And thought their image/mockup of The Print Version on an iPad was to make it easier for the general reader to understand what it was. Thanks for telling me that this is actually what you get, including the break through scrolling functionality.
If this is a sign of things to come in terms of merging the print and digital divisions of Fairfax then they are in big trouble. Why didnt Fairfax Digital insist on producing the IPad app for this and applying a more sensible pricing structure? Answer: Brian McCarthy is so print focused that he just can’t see the opportunity here. He clearly shouldnt be in the position he’s in. This relates directly back to the Crikey piece last week on McCarthy VS Matthews (FD’s CEO). If this latest disaster is anything to go on, the sooner Matthews takes the helm the better…..and with JB leaving the board this week, maybe that might be more likely than ever before.
Does the link to Telstra mean that it will only work with a Telstra data plan?
This is just retarded. What a fundamentally clueless way to launch what could be a tremendous opportunity in the Australian market (look at the Guardian’s brilliant iPhone app, and brilliant sales results, in the UK).
Aside from the stupidity of forcing people to take out a $205 print sub, why would anyone prefer to use this app than use their iPad to surf the entirely free smh.com.au on the internet???
Douchebags.
Jesus, as Ashadi points out, it’s just the pressreader app with Smh as the only
Paper available. Why on earth would I pay for this over a pressreader subscription?
Don’t think it could be more confusing. Lucky the website works just fine on Safari on ipad so can avoid opening my wallet altogether.
Every time I’m in an airport terminal, every time I take my kid to the zoo, every time I go to any public event of any kind, there are the newspaper publisher’s casual staff stuffing circulation-bulking copies in my hand. What a waste of paper, energy and ultimately, carbon.
So when the iPad comes out and newspaper publishers announce their enthusiasm for the platform, the optimist in me thinks, “Yay! A chance for newspaper publishers to finally Get It!”. But no, they seem determined to march right on to extinction with barely a glance to the right or left.
One unhappy side-effect of just publishing a PDF to the iPad is the size of the file. On iTunes it says, “Publication download sizes vary from approximately 13MB to 75MB, depending on the number of pages in each issue.”
If the average day’s issue is, say, 25MB, that’s a fair chunk of the average home’s monthly bandwidth allowance right there.
Does everybody really need the entire newspaper? It’s digital, right, so couldn’t I just download the sections I’ll actually read?
Fairfax just piling digital waste on top of paper waste. What an embarrassment.
Alanjones, 25mbs is nothing in usage these days.
There are some obvious pointers here about this app. The reason print are handling it, is because Fairfax see it as a threat to circ. This is the same reason that they have had this ‘brilliant’ idea to get it to push circ. with compulsory subs.
What they have failed to see is that iPad numbers are so low that it wont affect circ at all. Having a few hundred extra print readers is insurmountable to the opportunity they have squandered by not using the iPad as an innovation, and rather trying to stifle its use.
This has caused the app functionality to be terrible since they didnt get any input from their digital department who actually are in touch with this audience, but more importantly have worked on similar (iphone apps) projects before, and learnt the lessons already. As you have said Tim, they are using this app defensively to protect their business, since they arent innovative enough to roll with the market, or look to change their current model of publishing
@Riarn
“…they didnt get any input from their digital department who actually are in touch with this audience”
joking?
The best examples of newspaper and magazine apps were designed by print guys. The SMH seems an exception to the rule.
Alan Jones – i’m with you on the circ driving wastage. whenever i go to etihad stadium, on entry I’m handed a fat copy of the weekend Age (either Sat or Sun) which is the last thing I want in my hands when a game is about to start.
Those who know – given this has been handed to me, am I claimed as a ‘reader’ by Fairfax?
If it’s all about circulation- why not give it out for free everywhere?
The real reason for this policy is that the advertising industry won’t allow digital versions of the print edition for audit. Without that they are never going to pay.
The Age actually had the same app (Press Reader) the weekend after the iPad was released in Australia. It was available for all of about 4 hours before they pulled it, presumably because it had the same negative ratings that the SMH is currently receiving.
Obviously the only thing Fairfax has learnt in the interim is how to make the offering even less attractive.
1.Joy Barrett
24 Jul 10
3:54 pm
Does the link to Telstra mean that it will only work with a Telstra data plan?
Joy
You can use it on any data plan. But, if you have a telstra data plan you are still charged for the download, so with a 75mb file, you will use your (for example) 1gb monthly allowance in 13 days.
Of course you can stay at home and download it via wi-fi (particularly as Telstra has finally upped its download capacity on most plans), saviing your valuable mobile download capacity, but if you were at home you may as well get the hard copy delieverd……………….oh thats right, you do
Stupid Fairfax.
Has anyone else downloaded the New Zealand Herald app for ipad? That app is great, its free and it actually makes good use of the ipad technology. It also integrates advertising in a good way – which you don’t mind because it is free.
How can fairfax get it so wrong on SMH but do something completely different on the New Zealand Herald??
Dave
PS. Fairfax, if you want us to pay for content, you have to make it worth our while. If i want to read the paper edition, ill just do it at work, for free 🙂
This really is just beyond ridiculous.
Fairfax are simply jumping on the iPad bandwagon and trying to push their own agenda rather than actually “getting” not only what the device is, but whats its users are doing with it.
Why would I pay for you to simply something that i can get for free anyway? I am happy to pay, but for sweet baby jebus sake give me something new innovative and a reason to spend my cold hard earned cash….. oh wait… newspapers… print media…. Dodo birds…..
Fairfax if your reading this. You would be wise to set up some iPad user focus groups to determine what users or your readers want instead of dishing out this utter tripe to consumers and expecting them to be happy.
No doubt int he next few weeks we will see some press release saying “Our app has been downloaded XXX times! its a huge success” if only we could get data on how many times an app was downloaded then deleted an hour later!
Sent from my iPad
(ok it wasnt)
I would’ve thought it was quite obvious why it was Fairfax Media that launched the app and not Fairfax Digital. Fairfax Digital hosts smh.com.au, The Sydney Morning Herald brand, whether it be in print or on the iPad, is a Fairfax Media brand.
I’ve got an ipad and had the opportunity of viewing SMH via the Pressreader app a few weeks before it stopped appearing as free content within the app. The experience may not be the smoothest, but it gave me what I wanted … an image of the SMH newspaper … with ads, lift-outs and all.
I liked it and was very much looking forward to it coming out as a standalone app. I’m was (and still am) prepared to pay for it. But when the new app was launched over the weekend, I was very disappointed to read that I had to sign up to a print subscription too! That’s NOT what I want! I want the digital version. Why would I want both the print and digital version?
And what I want is available to international users for ~$50 a year. But as a NSW resident I can’t pay for that .. instead they want me to pay >$200 for print + digital delivery. I DON’T want the print version … I want the digital one only!
I don’t buy the SMH, but would if I could buy the digital version. Perhaps SMH should market a digital weekly subscription at only $0.99 per week. That might go down much better! (At that price, I’d definately be a new customer!).
I was so excited to read about the new SMH App on Friday that I signed up straight away.
This morning I looked at The Aust app as usual – it took a nanosecond to automatically download today’s news once I clicked on the app and I could easily find the stories I wanted.
Then I went to the SMH site. I had to find the date of the edition I wanted – the app was dumping me into an August 2010 calendar – and then I was left scrolling and zooming through pages and pages to find the stories I was interested in. The delivery was quite cumbersome and a little glitchy.
Far, far easier just to read the hard print paper.
If the newspaper proprietors keep stuffing up their adoption of digital delivery then they will hasten the demise of their print version. They will only have themselves to blame, and serves them bloody well right!
Age monday circulation (paid) now down to 110,00, according to inside sources.
Riarn: “iPad numbers are so low that it wont affect circ at all”
I actually heard that one of the major online research agencies did a survey of online Australians, and a very large % intend to purchase an iPad within the next 12 months!
Ignore this new device at your own peril!
I was actually a herald reader, till I got my hands on an iPad and switched to The Australian (I’m not loyal and it’s all I could get). I read about 80 per cent of the content available every morning – how ridiculous that I’m not including in the Australian’s circulation.
Meanwhile, I downloaded the SMH app over the weekend and I have to say, I’m appalled.
What a wasted opportunity, and a waste of my time as I had to slowly download large clunky documents. SMH already lost a massive audience by not releasing their app closer to the iPad’s release – one would have thought with that added time, they could at least come up with something half decent. The Australian’s app is not perfect, but it’s way ahead of anything any other daily metropolitan is offer.
Can you buy the app and then ask them not to deliver the paper?
Sounds incredibly similar to the massive balls up that Fairfax have made with the AFR.COM set up. Most …nay all large corporates need to be able to share digitised information freely and AFR have made this impossible hence they lose more market share to The Australian and Business Spectator
@ Jonathon
I have it on good authority that only the newspaper team worked on this. Above have some good reasons for this (canabilizing the paper would be the best).
@notkidding
Im not suggesting they ignore it, quite the opposite. I think they should embrace it in its form, not try to use it like a road block like they are.
I think its niave of the media industry if advertisers and media buyers are scared off of working on integrated campaigns with the ipad because they cant count the readers yet. On your point, ignore this device and beware
What Dave (#23) said is on the mark. I pulled up the NZ Herald app yesterday and was blown away with it.
I’ve refused the SMH app out of principle – I’ll just navigate it on Safari/atomic/icab on the ipad instead of paying for physical editions I don’t need.
Ben. The papers handed out at the MCG (c’mon … you’ve moved to Sydney … let’s say it’s the SCG!) are counted in the “event sales” category of circulation. “Event sales” are capped at 1% of Average Nett Paid Sales. So, let’s say that the Saturday Age is doing 280,000 copies, just 2,800 of the ‘give-aways’ can be counted as circulation.
Giving away newspapers is a fair marketing exercise, and the newspapers need avery promotional and marketing channel open to them. If you read the fine-print of your ticket or membership you will find somewhere that the ticket price includes your copy of the newspaper – whether you take one or not, and whether you like it or not. Under this, they count as “paid”, which is why they are capped.
As for readership, that is done by the Morgan surveys, so if you read the paper at the footy or take it home to read then you are a valid reader – there is no restriction on how you acquire that copy or whether you pass it on (which is why readers always exceed circulation).
Regarding blending the ‘circulation’ of hard-copy and digital editions of a newspapers, we have to stop and think why we do circulation at all. At its simplest it is to verify the copies sold to those that pay for advertisements in that copy. If the digital edition and the hard-copy edition are different they have to be reported separately. If an adverstiser wanted a half-page on page 13 for strategic reasons, then the ad must be carried in the exact position in both sources of the copy. Of course in an on-line edition, we can have content linked in all sorts of fashions, ads on rotation etc – which is why they are not counted as circulated copies but are measured via impressions.
I hope this clears up some of the metrics issues.
Great analysis, Tim.
But this is what Fairfax does. It’s had a decade or more of this.
Brian McCarthy will be joining Fred Hilmer in the Fairfax CEO “Oops We Missed Another Digital Boat” Hall of Fame.
Under the McKinsey&Co-trained genius of Freddy Hilmer, Fairfax managed to miss out on being;
carsales.com.au (market cap today $1B)
realestate.com.au (market cap today $1.2B)
seek.com.au (market cap today $2.4B)
Totally digital missed opportunity score card: $4.6 billion. oops.
So is anyone really surprised they are stuffing up the monitisation of the ipad?
It’s the great Fairfax CEO tradition. Chin out, talk tough and then have no shame in losing another sqillion dollar digital opportunity.
No wonder John B Fairfax retired last week from the board – it must have been finally too sad to watch.
The merits of placing a former print editor to be in charge of their app strategy and implementation is already proving to be a disaster for Fairfax. The digital division of Fairfax does a pretty good job, so why would you put a print dinosaur in charge of one of the most critical digital divisions?
Given I have the squished tree edition, Thurs-Sun, for $52 a year (I think they sold it to me via a cinema membership), why on earth would I bother shelling out an additional $150 just to get the same thing on an iPad?
Might as well put the cash towards the London Times paywall.
the NZ Herald is nothing to do with Fairfax – it is owned by APN – I am sure the NZ Herald does not want to be associated with Fairfax who they see a big competitor in the NZ market.
Damien @ #39: Putting Fairfax print editors in charge of Fairfax print products has been no less a disaster.
The whole company, top to bottom, is a case study in whatever journalistic or commercial vice you might care to mention.
If the best the opposition can muster is John Hartigan and Little Dick Freudenstein and Fairfax still come off second best, well you know they are thoroughly stuffed.
@Inky – “Putting Fairfax print editors in charge of Fairfax print products has been no less a disaster.”
That’s debatable given the above result! Fairfax Digital has pretty solid track-record, therefore i doubt they would have been so naive as to launch this product.
It would have taken longer to get the App approved than it would to develop it. So the only upshot is that it can’t have cost them very much in resource time. Scrap it and start again.
Just realized why they have gone this way
Sell an app, pay apple 30%
Give an app away and sell a subscription through the web site? Give apple nothing
Bet they won’t sell many subscriptions
Great post Sydney Gazette
I had a bit to do with Fairfax a few years back, helping them develop real-time news offerings for their website. I’m never met a more clueless lot. The fiasco with this app surprises me not at all. I’m very glad not to be a shareholder.
am wondering if occurre d to any of the above that the evidence of profit in the app biz for news media has yet to emerge. It is hardly surprising that Fairfax and everyone else in that business is trying to hang onto the established business that does make money, even if it’s shrinking.
@Curious Pink
Wired saw 100,000 downloads of their iPad app (average print circ 70,000). Guardian’s iPhone app could be around a £2m business, with a significant portion of that coming from overseas. True, the vast majority won’t make money, but given that no major Aussie newspaper has developed a truly native, consumer-focussed app experience, and also given the take-up of mobile devices in Australia, there is a solid opportunity there. And since when has releasing terrible products been a sensible business strategy???
While I agree with most comments, the common theme of print newspaper wastage bothers me. Don’t people realise the whole digital age, with mass production of computers, e- readers, mobile phones etc etc is incredibily wasteful. Not to mention the power required to run these devices and the fact we update them (throw them out) on a regular basis. Don’t be so smug about 21st century media wastage.
@Jonathan
You’re actually agreeing with me Jonathan. The numbers are meaningless in the context. The Guardian is rapidly going broke and it has by far the best digital strategy (with the possible exception of The New York Times.)
News Media will have to create products capable of supporting prices far higher than those indicated so far. It;s simply nowhere near enough, even allowing for the shutdown of the print and distribution costs of newspapers.
If newspapers spent more time on providing a better news and entertainment service they wouldn’t be facing a slow demise. E.g. when I’m reading an online story about F***edif I know wherestan I can click and discover, and maybe also see a display ad that invites me to watch a video ad to win a holiday to its famous whatever. Trouble is the boys and girls that run newspapers would need an atom bomb under there bums to get their brains outside an imaginary square. Just look at the level of innovation they have collectively invested in over recent years. Oh yes, the printing press.