Is this doing good? Or shameless exploitation?

Child abuse victim Michael HatfieldWhat if a victim of child abuse agrees to be tattooed as part of your campaign? And what if a child abuse charity stands to gain from the publicity? Is it still exploitation?

I have read a press release we were sent today from a PR agency in Queensland a few times over. And every time it makes me shudder. Here’s the first paragraph: “Harshmellow Media + Design launched a year-long fundraising campaign for photo book Townsville INK yesterday (March 2, 2011) with a North Queensland man and former victim of child abuse making a lasting commitment to child protection by having the logo of charitable organisation ACT for Kids tattooed on himself.”

Seven picked up the news, and ran a story featuring the victim being tattooed by a local tattoo artist whose work is to run in said photo book, Harshmellow’s client. Here’s a clip that was posted on YouTube:

Be a member to keep reading

Join Mumbrella Pro to access the Mumbrella archive and read our premium analysis of everything under the media and marketing umbrella.

Become a member

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

"*" indicates required fields

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.