My rules on posting comments for clients

Last week Mumbrella revealed an Australian marketing agency is planning to post links within social media discussions on behalf of clients, using assumed identities. The article became one of Mumbrella’s most discussed items to date. In this guest post, Geoff Emerson, boss of The Prosperity Principal, explains  how the debate has affected his thinking

When Mumbrella contacted me, I imagined there would be some debate around the Trusted Avatar product I have created. It is a small part of our offering and I somewhat naively believed the debate would reflect this. I won’t comment on the nature of people’s comments or how things could have been handled better, but what I can tell you is that I have thought long and hard about what I would write next.  

geoffrey-emersonTo put things into context, when I was head of digital at my previous role I helped create social media products and what are still industry best practice processes in many people’s minds. My new company is in its infancy and I haven’t even had time to write the website copy, let alone process documents for new products.

This brings me back to the current debate. The Trusted Avatar product is new and as such had problems that needed to be addressed. I had a set of guidelines in my head about instructing employees verbally and maintaining direct oversight throughout the campaign. Through this process I did a lot of thinking and realised that for such an emotionally charged subject there also needed to be a clear set of written operational guidelines around the product.

Subscribe to keep reading

Join Mumbrella Pro to access the Mumbrella archive and read our premium analysis of everything under the media and marketing umbrella.

Subscribe

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

"*" indicates required fields

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.