Ruby Rose naked on October issue of Maxim

Ah, wigs. I was wondering when she grew her hair.

Wow, what a statement! “Look at me, I’m posing naked in a men’s magazine trying to take a stand!”. The readership and content of this publication is hardly relevant to an animal rights forum.

In any case, that is a very strong cover.

Last time I looked wasn’t the beaver an animal? I can certainly see the relevance

Men want hot naked lesbians, apparently.

Hmm, can’t really argue with that, I suppose.

Nice wig….u go & stand up for women every where Ruby what a role model you are…….as Kath said…..Look at Me, Look at Me….Kimmy Look at me!!!

PETA is the one of the few organisations that eclipses Greenpeace in its cretinous campaigning.

That said, if they deliver me Ruby Rose in the buff, I’ll gladly peruse her fine form over a Sunday Roast.

The wall in the background really grabbed my attention.

I dont think that can sit on magazine stands, with kids about?

Men want hot naked lesbians, apparently.

Hmm, can’t really argue with that, I suppose.

– Definitely not wrong.

lets stop the exploitation of little furry animals, and replace it with more exploitation of women instead.

nice tits….err tatts

She looks better without the lesbian haircut.

Average typography.

I do admire a woman with principals. Particularly when those principals don’t preclude her from getting her kit off for the “reading” pleasure of tradies and students. Peta really are leaping into the porn game it seems.

I think that this PR stunt will have exactly the opposite effect to that intended by PETA, animal cruelty activists generally and Ms Rose: I fpredict thousands of Monkey’s being spanked across the nation.

She looks delighted to be there. What a grim cover.

By the look of it, she’s really not into fur at all.

If i had to choose, i’d choose fur. Bear skin is really cozy. Everyone should try it at least once.

Let’s be honest. Ruby doing this is less about helping animals and more about keeping herself planted squarely in the spotlight, albeit with no clothes on.

It is a tad strange that a well known lesbian has chosen to promote her cause in a men’s magazine… Wouldn’t Marie Claire or Cosmo have been more suitable? At least the message would have stood half a chance of being absorbed… On another point, I wonder if the curtains match the fur carpet…

@ Alison. I think were looking at polished floorboards.

@AdamS…. that’s a good (and hilarious) point!!

ahem… http://www.iisretard.com/wp-co.....-scary.gif

@Alison_F Re: The choice of Maxim vs. Marie Claire.
Ruby loves to show herself off to the boys. Not the first time she’s done a lads mag. Won’t be the last, either.
My money is on her becoming straight or bi relatively soon. (Not joking.)

Never understood why lesbians get lesbian haircuts. Surely if you’re a woman into other women, you want your women to look like women and not like men with breasts?

RR looks twice as good with the wig. Not a big fan of the sleeve-tatt though.

everyone relax for a tick. It doesn’t matter why she did it, or whether its right or wrong. The only thing that matters is the fact it’s f’in awesome.

@Hmmm…. how a ‘woman’ looks has always been determined by what society deems acceptable and this has been crafted over centuries by men. Lesbians choosing to wear short hair is often an attempt to break these stereotypical ideals of how a woman ‘should’ look. But then, I guess you haven’t seen a woman in a while…

Signing up to being a masturbatory aid for teenage boys who are unable to bypass internet filters apparently has something to do with not wearing fur! You learn something new every day.