Sky News beefs up weekend supervision after Cottrell controversy
Sky News has put The Adam Giles Show in recess and appointed two new directors to manage the station’s weekend programming, following an interview with far-right nationalist Blair Cottrell on Sunday evening.
The broadcaster, which aired an interview with Cottrell on its new show with former NT chief minister Adam Giles, described it as an “error of judgement”.
The Adam Giles Show is now in recess
The right thing to do by Sky News, but too late. He already has the publicity and censorship story he wants.
I lost 48 of my parent’s immediate family of 50 to the Nazis. 6 million Jews were killed. Hundreds of thousands of decent Americans, Brits, Canadians and Anzacs were tragically killed in the same war.Millions more were victims in other countries.
SkyNews can apologise all it wants, but after 25 years of Foxtel I’ll cancel if they ever allow anyone like Cottrell any airtime again
Good for you, Victor. Could you please let me have Robert’s and your email addresses. I have a photo for you. Michael.
More left wing beat up of a interview for which Sky has apologised for unlike several other media organisations that interviewed the guy in the past including the ABC. Move on.
I really worry about denying people like Cottrell places to air their views – no matter how obnoxious.
If we don’t give them air time or space, how do we know what they are saying? And why do we then deny ourselves the opportunity to counter those views and slay their ideas with facts and evidence?
Had it not been for SkyNews I would never had heard of this guy and his really alarming views. But I am glad I now know what he thinks because he has made me think of how we would counter such extreme opinions as these.
Pretending these people don’t exist is not the answer.
I understand your reticence John. It is an issue I have wrestled with for ages.
Extremist views are like fires. If you do give them oxygen they will burn you every time. Therefore, I err on the side of caution of extinguishing something that is so potentially dangerous as Victor Grynberg points out. As for Pete … I just feel sorry for you.
Another John.
Please don’t.
No one is pretending Cottrell doesn’t exist. It’s simply an editorial decision (or should have been) that his views add nothing meaningful to the public discourse and are not worthy of air-time.
There is no such thing as a legitimate public debate about whether people of all races, religions, genders, and sexual orientations are entitled to life, dignity and basic human rights.
Attempting to debate people’s humanity is a waste of air-time and should be treated as such. We don’t waste air-time or column inches debating self-evident truths.
But we are talking about Newscorp here. The company has built an empire by inflaming prejudices, selling click bait, and inciting outrage however it can.
I come down very firmly in the “no platform for Nazis” camp, but Sky News could have had some mitigation if they’d introduced this guy with some background, not just “activist”.
“We now talk to activist Blair Cottrell who has previously argued for every classroom in Australia to have a portrait of Adolf Hitler, has boasted of his use of violence and terror to control women and has been convicted of crimes including arson, stalking, drug and weapons possession and breaching court orders.”
It would’ve taken about 30 seconds of research.
Well said Joan. The last thing we want is a network that behaves like Fox News in the US here in Australia. Fox News divides the community and covers news with a hard right editorial line to add salt to the wounds that pass for political debate. Its heartening to see so many people responding to Cottrell’s interview and forcing a change of tack from Sky. I have personally contacted advertisers like Luxury Escapes to thank them for pulling their sponsorship of this platform for hate speech. Its time Sky got their editorial act together and covered the news with journalistic integrity.
“Beefing up weekend supervision…. appointing 2 new directors”
This is complete BS… the 2 “new” directors already have jobs and will continue to hold them. This is simply a case of dishing out some new titles to make it look like something is being done.
At the very heart of the problem is a lack of senior, experienced staff with the ability to make the right call (one or two good people are not enough).
This is the legacy of a deliberate policy of under resourcing that’s come home to roost after years in play.