A spammer writes (and writes and writes)
Like most websites, Mumbrella gets a lot of spam comments.
This one though, is the most epic of all time, for sheer length, if nothing else:
I nеedeԁ to drаft you a bіt of obѕervation sο аs to gіve thankѕ оveг again wіth уouг fаntaѕtic thoughts yοu’ve featured on this site. It has been extremely open-handed with people like you to offer without restraint all most people might have supplied as an ebook to help make some money for their own end, specifically considering that you might have done it in the event you desired. These smart ideas also worked like the good way to comprehend most people have the identical desire just like my own to realize very much more in terms of this issue. I believe there are thousands of more fun moments ahead for folks who browse through your website.
I would like to show some appreciation to you just for rescuing me from this instance. Because of surfing throughout the internet and coming across thoughts that were not helpful, I assumed my life was over. Living minus the solutions to the difficulties you’ve гesolved bу wаy of уоur entire repoгt is а crіtical сaѕe, аnd ones which may have badly affесted mу
A future society will find this. It will be their Odyssey.
by lifting their texts into your body, assuming you don’t exclude google and bing searches, you have just made their texts match ‘valid’ content, and also made your own texts match ‘invalid’ content. The net result in SEO is null, but I wonder if the trend continued, if you’d come out the winner…
What happened is that the spammer’s *entire* collection of stock spam comments accidentally got dumped into the one comment.
This has been documented elsewhere: http://boingboing.net/2012/07/.....lt-sp.html
I feel dizzy!
Exactly, Stephen. Amateur spammer brings dark SEO to Mumbrella.
This is what happens when you pay a copywriter per word.
Woohoo thank goodness for misconfigured software. Amateur spammer messed up a black hat setting.
Actually with the rate of new content on Mumbrella calling out the content won’t have a negative SEO affect, but will probably damage the effectiveness of that content that makes it through the filters on other sites.
Word vomit.
Our new computer overlords are still working on their mastery of syntax.
ωhats ωith the ωeird ω’s???
ωhats ωith the ωeird ω’s???
… sponsored by woolies ?