The Australian defends Bill Leak cartoon despite growing condemnation
The Australian has defended a controversial cartoon published today, which suggests indigenous fathers do not know the names of their own children, by insisting it has bought a “crucial issue” into the public domain.
Editor in chief Paul Whittaker said Bill Leak’s cartoons “force people to examine the core issues in a way that sometimes reporting and analysis can fail to do”.
He said that too often people “skirt around the root causes and tough issues”.
But as the broadsheet defended the cartoon – published on National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children’s Day – the New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council attacked it as “ugly, insulting and embarrassing”.
Just another in a string of racist Bill Leak cartoons. That the Australian continues to defend him says a lot about the depths it has sunk to.
There is nothing challenging or intelligent about it. Just the scrawlings of a bigot.
Why would anyone do or say that? Is the man insane? Has he ever lived in a remote community? He should be sacked and the paper fined for supporting such bigotry. The Australian? Wrong name for your paper fellas:)
The editor thinks the cartoon raised a serious issue that need to be discussed.
So where is the discussion exactly? Surely not the oped he published earlier?
Send Bill and The Australian newspaper to Northern Ireland where they can practice their bigotry alongside their racist and bigot cousins, namely the N.Ireland orange unionists.
They will get on very well together.
Someone has obviously told the Australian that there’s money to be made in selling advertising space for bigots.
I can’t imagine any rational human being still buys this dross.
What is happening here is the silencing free speech.
Welcome to the new age of fascism.
If you think calling out and criticising racism is silencing free speech and fascism, then you have no understanding of free speech, nor of fascism.
Today Leak has published his argument: kids in jail often come from bad homes. Go figure.
Mmmm…not defensible