70 jobs in the air after Fairfax proposes moving NZ sub-editing hubs back to Pagemasters
Fairfax Media is set to shed potentially another 70 jobs, as it looks to move production of its metro newspapers back to Pagemasters, less than two years after moving production to its New Zealand hub to save costs.
The proposal, announced by editorial director Sean Aylmer today, means sub-editing and layout of pages for papers including the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age will be split between Pagemasters in Australia and New Zealand.
Fairfax has come in for criticism over slipping standards of sub-editing in its papers since it moved production offshore, with Media Watch skewering it for continually duplicating the same story on different pages of the same papers.
However, it does not appear the changes have been driven by those mistakes, with Aylmer writing in a note to staff the new arrangements “are based on a variable pricing model – a story and page rate – providing us additional flexibility and savings”.
More proof that Fairfax Media have lost the plot. The way employees are treated at that paper is a total disgrace.
The Age certainly isn’t worth buying anymore. Too many errors.
Fairfax obviously has no regard for the people who work for the business, and even less for the people they expect to buy their products. But none of this is new. It’s been going on for decades.
You really do have to ask why this works given that there is a good chance the page masters staff are former Fairfax staff. A management issue.
Fairfax and Pageakers seem to be playing yo yo with staff.
With circulation falling, and the growth of digital ad revenue growing nowhere near as fast as print ad revenue is falling, is it any wonder that fairfax are trying to cut costs wherever they can?
I’m surprised people are surprised, and I’m sure these cuts will continue to come thick and fast until the publishing arm makes the amount of money they think it can. Clue: it can’t!
Newspaper circulations have been falling for many decades. The only response seems to be to cut costs. The result of this is a loss of quality followed by more circulation decline. It is strange no one seems to look at the product and how it can be changed to appeal more to readers. It is not the internet which has caused this problem, it is the decline in the quality of the newspapers that is the problem.
Don’t think anyone is surprised at the cost cutting (plenty more of that to come) but at the confused decision making going on –first the solution was to outsource production to page masters, then it was to create a new production hub and shift all pages there, and now it’s back to pagemasters again….
Regardless of its other issues, as a sub at Bauer Media, I can report that Bauer Media has not outsourced its subbing to Pagemasters.
Hey Reader.
I think you’ll find your comment should read “More proof that Fairfax Media has lost the plot.” Back into your glass house.
Hey why dont they jus get da werk experience kid todo it?
sbbing not that hrd reeely
Fairfax might consider purchasing a spell-checker. A grammar-checker would be a useful adjunct.
So was “The problem with a lot of rich people is they are wiley” (SMH, Feb. 12) approved by the current subs?
Or “his old university, which was honoroung him”, etc, etc?
Fairfax (and News Corp) are being too reactive. Instead of trying ways to increase (digital) revenue, they are too focused on cutting costs — could executive salaries be the next to get the chop? Nah!! The math doesn’t add up: cut your editorial staff, increase the workload on the survivors and expect “quality” journalism (whatever that means these days!) Yeah right! Fairfax is morphing into a marketing/PR company while News Corp is turning into a mouthpiece