Five more Kyle questions answered: Would ARN have to pay a lump sum?

Last week, lawyer Michael Byrnes answered five questions on Mumbrella’s mind after reading Kyle’s initial open letter. Today, he weighs in on the legal arguments and potential financial implications for ARN revealed in Sandilands’ court documents.

Yesterday, Mumbrella published the full text of Kyle Sandilands‘ “Concise Statement” in his lawsuit against ARN in the Federal Court.

The statement argues that ARN’s termination of Sandilands’ contract was invalid, and that Sandilands, through his company Quasar, is still owed all entitlements under his 10-year agreement.

We had some questions, and turned to media contract lawyer Michael Byrnes. Byrnes is an experienced workplace relations lawyer and partner at Swaab, with extensive experience in media and talent.

Michael Byrnes

Be a member to keep reading

Join Mumbrella Pro to access the Mumbrella archive and read our premium analysis of everything under the media and marketing umbrella.

Become a member

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

"*" indicates required fields

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.