Andrew Jaspan: Tabloid SMH and Age will merge and go mid-market

Not sure why mumbrella is making headlines from anything jaspan says. As a failed editor of the age his job now is…… what exactly. i believe he is refered to by folks at news and fairfax as mr unemployable. He did not manage to sell any papers during his brief tenure as an editor, so why is he a credible commentator now. come on mumbrella – find us something worth reading….

wow – way to write their own death…Good news for the Australian…A shame for journalism and most importantly the readers.

Given Linnell’s history with the Daily Telegraph where things did not go well, readers of the SMH and The Age would soon be left with nothing to read if the newspapers were redirected to compete with the lower end of the market.

Any word on when paywalls / meters will go up on Fairfax sites? I thought it was slated for Dec 12 / Jan 13.

I!ve already noticed that SMH has merged many of its sections and I’m not impressed.Most of it seems to emanate from Melbourne,which is not much use if you’re searching for details about Sydney entertainment,for example.

The Age has not been a really good upmarket paper for 25 years. And Jaspan certainly contributed nothing to its reputation for quality. But it is certainly true that Fairfax has given up on distinction. The survivors at the SMH (such as those carrying on the ICAC story) are like heroic survivors of a shipwreck. Hanging on, hoping for an island to come into view.

Who on earth cares any more about these organisations? Sure they’ll bumble on for a few more years – but the mystic veils from behind which they defined and described the world to us have, Oz-like, fallen away. SIngle-point news sources are being quietly bypassed and made irrelevant by alternative, inclusive, many-to-many technologies allowing relationships between source, interpreter and consumer to be complex, dynamic, ever-changing. The clever, articulate and interesting people who currently write for these organisations will eventually realise they can write from anywhere is the new reality and abandon these organisations. These changes are just the scraping of chairs being re-arranged.

I beg to differ – he scooped a coveted PANPA and did all the hard work no one at Fairfax was prepared to do. Circulation, readership and online figures all increased during his tenure – give the guy his due, he’s no slouch.

I don’t think Jaspan was as bad an editor as some would have you believe, but does he seriously think Fairfax will take its cues from the Daily Mail? Have you seen The Daily Mail? It makes the Herald Sun look like the New York Times.

As for the ‘merging’ of the SMH and Age. This has already happened as part of the Linnell’s restructure and been widely reported. Sure it may have ‘weakened diversity’, but if the alternative is no Fairfax voice at all, then surely that’s worse?

@peterbayley
Those of us who like to read care about these organisations because they still manage to offer coherent writing on a wide variety of subjects – and that’s despite their managements doing their best to bugger it up by firing their best writers and offshoring their subbing to save every cent they can. This is unlike the web which offers convulted prose such as yours – too many tortured images and over-worked adjectives in search of a good sub.

Spot on zumabeach, but as Fairfax have decide newspapers do not need sub editors there is little chance of you reading a well produced newspaper agin.

Andrew Jaspan giving advice on how to run a newspaper is like John Hewson giving advice on politics. Hasn’t stopped either of them – but it should.