Has the logo had its day?
Corporations are constantly tinkering with their brands, but in a world with so many touchpoints should they be less concerned with having a corporate logo asks Patrick Guerrera.
In a world where personal brands, social media and an absolute plethora of content stretches into every waking moment of our lives, what role does a logo play in contemporary branding?
There are simple answers: the ongoing interdependence between corporate reputation and corporate brand is always a consideration. The logo is the trust mark that symbolises the heritage and history of an organisation and its people to all their stakeholders, not just their customers. This symbol is a living artefact and signature of the organisation, its past and all its aspirations.
Good article. I don’t agree that the corporate guideline document is dead, but I do think the old format with highly restrictive parameters and measures is obsolete. I’m also not sure the logo is dead, but I think there should be more flexibility with its usage. These days the guidelines I provide are more like a starting point for the client, rather than a cul de sac.
its important to distinct between a logo and a brand mark. two different things in my mind.
a logo you can buy for $99 – it has no depth, no thinking, no strategy behind it, no roll out in front of it. it’s a single piece of design, that works one way, in one application, on a white background
a brand mark is essentially just the single most commonly recognised element of the entire brand. if you look at in in isolation then, yeah, maybe it is a little unimpressive, but it’s just the pointy end of a hue and involved exercise with tremendous commercial value.
also, a corp style guide might not be needed by skilled branding agency’s (although I bet they still charge $200k for them) but in a fluctuating marketing department of a business, it’s really the only reference tool to stop some exec plastering the wrong shit in the wrong way, which will erode your brand over time and any equity that comes with it.
Patrick, Sorry, but I can’t help thinking this reads as a catchy and accessible headline, while trying to slide in a piece of overly cerebral brand strategy blah.
Consider… we believe the construct of relational intelligence, is a significant lens to consider when embarking on any type of rebranding program. Or …this provides a significant lens for attribution definition as well as brand design, experience and communication…
Ironic given M&C’s own brand credo of “brutal simplicity”.
The cynic in me suggests this reads as a thinly veiled PR piece (nothing wrong with that) that seeks to connect HBR’s insights to your brand.
I’m reminded of the Albert Einstein’s quote “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. It takes a touch of genius — and a lot of courage — to move in the opposite direction.”
So let’s try and bring this closer to some brutal simplicity. The logo is the simplest, shorthand expression of the brand and what it embodies. And when creating logo and brand guidelines, don’t confuse this literal asset management tool (which creates consistency in the brands expression) for a true understanding of the brand’s positioning and how it resonates against its chosen audiences and segments.
Very insightful.
The 6 types of brand-customer relationships is a really useful framework to use for clients.
In my experience, guidelines have already become mini-cards and cheat-sheets, so total extension seem like the logic conclusion.
Is it just me or are these kind of glib assertions about millennials getting a teeny bit tired now?
Re: the Avery, Fournier & Wittenbraker hypothesis.
An interesting thought experiment. Some of it might even be partially true.
Even if it were true, by far the vast majority of any brands buyers fall into bucket 1.
This is why things like logos and branding are so important.
So that distracted and disinterested buyers can easily recognise the brand they bought last time and then get on with their lives.
Ask Tropicana how they got on.
Millenials? Theoretical rhetoricians ? LP&E?
The entire package, including the apps packs of Gen Y and Gen X extensions, is a frequently opened toy box, it is therefore, also a frequently closed one.
Fads and fashions will come and go like funding or the tides, but the Logo will be with us for a long long time. Heat embossed, stamped into the metal like a hall mark, or rotating in space. We haven’t seen the last of soda syphons either.