‘Practice social distancing’ is terrible messaging; the government needs to communicate better
We learnt how to stop infection and change behaviour 30 years ago, Deborah Soden argues. And the advertising and comms messages learnt during the AIDS crisis need to be applied by the government now to COVID-19.
‘Practice social distancing’? That’s message distancing. Now isn’t the time to foist vague new phrases on a population either too fearful to take it in, too confused to know what to do, or too full of bravado to care.
We know how to communicate clearly and effectively to stop a deadly chain of infection. We did it 30-something years ago.
When AIDS was rife in the 1980s, the government’s first awareness campaign was the 1987 Grim Reaper ads. It got attention, but didn’t change behaviour. It scared the bejeezus out of people – but didn’t tell them what they could do about it. There was no safe sex message, just fear creation.
Agree. How about ‘Stay one and a half metres away from anyone.’…
ScoMo didn’t invent it. It’s a bad idea to have multiple competing key messages.
No one said he invented it, just that there needs to be a better way of expressing it to be more clear and concise.
Of course he didn’t invent it but he does have the power to get his comms team to create a much better message.
Bollocks!
The message is perfectly clear. As a bell
Dickheads are simply not taking notice, most especially younger, ‘indestructible’ people
What the guvment & chief medical officer should not do is so frequently say “Please”. They should convey “Do it or else”
chrism
Go Deb! Great to see your name again!
So if ‘practice social distancing’ fails to be the right fit whats your message solution?
I read a whole lot of past successful campaign references but at no point did you clarify what an actual message would be beneficial for society of today.
A crisis is a time for clarity, globally.
The phrase is understood and working worldwide.
Can it be extended? Yes? But replaced? No
Come on!
It’s not rocket science. If you expose yourself to someone in close proximity, you’re at risk.
If you’re dumb enough to get a hair cut, go for it.
They said enough.
Media commentators who are always looking for opportunity to get on an invisible high horse are the worst. The ones who apply personal anecdotes, even worse.
Some people won’t get it no matter what message you send.
Policing is the only way in this situation and making people aware of the fines involved if they don’t comply.
As usual, NZ and more specifically Jacinda Adern, showing ScoMo how it should be done.
“Act as if you have COVID-19” is pretty clear. As is ‘go out only to buy food or to get exercise (alone and near your house)’
God forbid someone should disagree with Saint Jacinta, but…
while at first blush, “act like you’ve got COVID19” sounds like neat cut-through, it’s nonsensical in practical terms
go on, try it.
If you have COVID 19, you go to your bedroom and don’t have contact with your household for at least 14 days, with your mobile fully charged and ready to dial OOO
that is NOT what non-infected, prudent people need to do
Ok so, I have COVID-19. According to health dept that means I should isolate myself and not go out in public expect to attend medical treatment ONLY (no shopping, no public exercise).
Food is running a little low. Can I go shopping? SM says its ok for me to go shopping so long as observe social distancing…
Both are easy to understand, but they are in conflict – you can’t stay at home and physically go out to the shopping center at the same time ….. (in case people didn’t realize that)
“Act as if you have COVID-19” shouldn’t be taken LITERALLY …
The health department is basically saying good hygiene, social distancing, self-isolation if you have any symptoms, etc. These are general and apply across the board. In themselves, they only have to do with preventing the spread of the virus.
When a politician comes out saying X industry will be restricted to Y customers at a time, they imply that limiting the X industry to Y customers is the best way to archive those health dept recommendations.
The confusion then is in how they pick seeming arbitrary and/or inconsistent values for X and Y.
With just a little common sense you could probably have Y+2 customers so long as observe hygiene and social-distancing – and the heath dept advice will still be served. BUT if the government applies a $11000 penalty for exceeding Y customers then people get the message that it’s not about common sense its about doing what government tells you to do – regardless of weather you have followed the health dept recommendations.
The problem is the health dept is pretty general about what is needed. But SM / his advisers are micro-managing the implementation. Breaking from their standard ‘until moral improves, the beatings will continue’ approach would help allot too.
When it seems they are selecting items/industries arbitrarily and/or coming up with seeming arbitrary/inconsistent restrictions many people begin to wonder if they are out of touch with reality (as usual) or begin to doubt their own common sense (after all our politicians wouldn’t enforce anything that is not already common sense – right?).
Play your part. Keep apart.
You should be in advertising.
Great article. We most certainly need clear, concise and consistent communication. A better phrase is physical distancing, social connection, as coined by the Danish prime Minister. People also need clear call to action messages, as this article points out. That is the only to get behavioural change. And it takes time …