Scam Kia paedophilia ad leads to awards ban on ad agency
The organisers of the Cannes Lions advertising awards have withdrawn two Lions over what appears to have been a scam ad entry which promoted paedophilia. All of the agency staff on the credits have been banned from competing for one year.
After public outrage at the ad, Kia insisted that the ad had never been commissioned or run.
According to the Lions:
“Following discussions between the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity and Moma Propaganda São Paulo, Brazil, the organisers of the Festival are withdrawing both the Silver Lion won in the Press category and the Bronze Lion won in Outdoor awarded for the Kia Motors air conditioning dual zone campaign ‘Teacher’ and ‘Princess’.
Ahh, so no-one thought that an issue may come up at some point ? In this case, I’d think the ones that judged this would have the reddest face of them all
Glad we’ve established pedophilia in advertising is BAD.
Now, when will we do the same for the overt sexual exploitation of women in the industry?
Also, just want to get this straight – the awards weren’t withdrawn because of the *content* but rather because the campaigns didn’t run?
Wow, sometimes this industry makes me want to puke.
Forget the fact it’s a scam, how the hell did it win anything?
How the hell was this awarded in the first place?
The ads aren’t even good! they make me want to stab something…
Both of those are so offensive, it’s hard to put into words how awful they are. Is that really the best way these guys thought they could sell a car?
Clearly there are far too few women in the advertising world. What a sick culture.
“You mean this blatantly pedophilic erotica wasn’t commissioned?! OUTRAGEOUS.”
I’m with commenters 3 & 4 – the concept is absolutely abhorrent. Banning these guys doesn’t seem like a sufficient response. Personally, I’d be referring them to the authorities so they can have their hard-drives checked…
I saw these ads a while back when looking at the press winners. Two things came to mind – 1. How paedophilistic are these ads; and 2. is paedophilistic even a word?
For crap like this to be created is bad enough and then to get two Lions at Cannes? What a joke. It isn’t even clever, just plain creepy
@Renee – totally agree, and I suspect that the (cough) creative minds behind this turd of a concept, simply don’t get any/enough action below the waistline other that that which they provide themselves.
What are you gronks on about? If you read each cartoon from top to bottom, as they’re meant to be read, each is a separate story. One is an innocent story that leaves you feeling nothing. The other is a hot sexual encounter. Dual Zone Air conditioning, get it? The problem comes when you read them from left to right and imagine the panel on the right is somehow related to the one on its left. It isn’t and it’s not meant to be.
@Useyourbrain – try again dude. Read the top version. It’s meant to be left right, not up down.
I’m stunned these received awards. The best explanation I can come up with is that they stood out for breaking the conventions for car ads (which they do) and for being edgy (which they are).
What wasn’t factored in was that they are disturbingly creepy and completely wrong for the brand, which is probably why Kia had the good sense not to run them.
Yeah @Useyourbrain put your mind back in the gutter take another look. If you read down the right column or as you called it the “hot sexual encounter” column it doesn’t make sense.
That’s not a Scum ad THIS is a scum ad
http://www.aktifmag.com/thats-.....a-scum-ad/
@useyourbrain Even if you are right (which I’m pretty sure you’re not), at some point someone during the creative process would’ve said…
“So we’ve created this ad that if read left to right (which admittedly is the natural tendency), is basically paedophilic…but don’t worry cause if you read it from top to bottom, it’s maybe ok”
If the comments here are anything to go by, you’d only deeply offend 90% of people. Absolutely worth one of the most prestigious ad awards going around.
I feel this type of advertising has no place in our world. It was only withdrawn as the adds were not run and commissioned by the client. They should never have been accepted for entry and should not have won a cretive award
Useyourbrain, clearly you need to.
Any comment yet from Ant Keogh? He was on the jury.
Cannes is a joke if this is the kind of crap that wins metal. I’d suggest the judges that awarded the lions be banned for life if they think this is good advertising.
“Glad we’ve established pedophilia in advertising is BAD.
Now, when will we do the same for the overt sexual exploitation of women in the industry?
Also, just want to get this straight – the awards weren’t withdrawn because of the *content* but rather because the campaigns didn’t run?
Wow, sometimes this industry makes me want to puke.”
Totally agree @Noni
I agree with @useyourbrain. It’s not meant to be a representation of the same girl, the someone just goofed by making her look like an older version of the previous girl. No paedophilia, just an oversight in the way the ad could be most easily interpreted: but by no means the only way it could be interpreted. Not saying I don’t see where you’re coming from, but there is more than one way to read a comic.
Seriously @Duh/@useyourbrain? (its pretty obvious you are the same person)
The comic CLEARLY reads left to right. Look at the bottom panels of the first ad. The left says “So where should we start?” and the right says “How about anatomy?”. Seems like a pretty clear conversation to me. Now read the right side top to bottom in the way you think its supposed to be read.
“It’s my pleasure believe me”
“mmmm it’s delicious, so juicy”
“How about anatomy?”
That makes about as much sense as making up a fake user to support your argument.