The implications for marketers and advertisers on Meta’s teen safety measures
Meta’s implementation of new safety features for teen accounts on Instagram is a good step forward, but what does it mean for marketers and advertisers? COO and VP of Marketing Science, Prophet, Hamish Mogan, explores.
While Meta has taken a step forward by implementing new safety features for teen accounts on Instagram, the approach feels more like a gentle nudge rather than a solid stride toward meaningful change.
The initiatives outlined on Meta’s community page and represent a commendable acknowledgment of the issues at hand, yet they strike me as peculiarly tepid, as both a father and an observer.
Addressing the influence of ‘likes’ could have been a transformative move. For many young users, ‘likes’ equate to a barometer of social standing, a modern currency of approval often mistaken for self-worth. Meta could have recalibrated this by limiting like counts or de-emphasising them within its algorithms. Such a change would not only alter the focus on quantifiable popularity, but also might encourage content that fosters genuine connections and creativity without the overhanging pressure of like-based validation.
Moreover, the introduction of features that encourage breaks from continuous screen time would have been an admirable addition. Imagine if, after a period of prolonged use, the platform would encourage teens with a screen blackout prompt, nudging them toward a healthy respite. This would not only help cultivate digital well-being but also serve as a checkpoint for self-awareness about the time spent online.
There’s an implication in this article that a lot of advertisers are currently targeting people 16 and under… that functionality doesn’t exist across the main social platforms in Australia (only 18+ is allowed), so I’m unsure of the relevance of your points