The twisted irony of generative AI disclosure

Every second person in Australia is using generative AI, but God forbid the pros have a crack. Writer and marketing communications consultant Brooke Hemphill unpacks the growing movement for disclosure around the use of generative AI.

Generative AI has had a busy couple of weeks. By now, you’ve probably seen the AI-generated video of Tom Cruise fighting Brad Pitt, created by Seedance 2.0, a tool from ByteDance, the parent company of Tiktok.

The viral clip, which has racked up millions of views, on top of a Seedance-generated reimagining of the Stranger Things ending, earned ByteDance a number of cease and desist letters.

The first came from Disney. The second, Paramount and, finally, Netflix joined the party as the studios and streamers called attention to the front-loading of copyrighted intellectual property, labelling it a “virtual smash-and-grab” of IP.

Be a member to keep reading

Join Mumbrella Pro to access the Mumbrella archive and read our premium analysis of everything under the media and marketing umbrella.

Become a member

Get the latest media and marketing industry news (and views) direct to your inbox.

Sign up to the free Mumbrella newsletter now.

"*" indicates required fields

 

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up to our free daily update to get the latest in media and marketing.