We need new models, not Naked 2.0
Former Naked managing director Ian Perrin here responds to Jen Davidson’s Mumbrella column calling for a reboot of the famed strategic agency. Perrin, who was also CEO of ZenithOptimedia ANZ and now runs Speed, weighs up the pros and cons of going back to the future.
Ian Perrin: Although Naked's work was innovative, it was difficult to measure
Jen Davidson’s thoughtful article last week on the potential return of Naked 2.0 has sparked plenty of conversation about future agency models and how we adapt in an ever-changing landscape. Having been part of Naked 1.0, and trying to replicate its best bits ever since, I couldn’t resist responding. But before we posture about the future, it’s worth revisiting why 1.0 failed in the first place.
There were two major factors unrelated to the model itself. First, the business was sold to the wrong acquirers, with Photon entering a death spiral. Second, the GFC created significant financial pressure across the industry, including for Naked.
These pressures exposed a third issue: building a sustainable, consistent, and profitable model not tied to executional output. In strong economic conditions, clients were comfortable with a strategy-led model directing a village of specialist executional agencies, creative, media, PR and digital, to deliver agnostic, strategically grounded work. ‘Share a Coke’ is a perfect example of how powerful that model could be.
Upvote
Interesting take
Agree (especially about the enero/photon nonsense) but disagree as Naked UK was a totally different – and more successful/relevant – prop and was based on media / production neutrality. Also Naked Numbers was way before its time and pre MMM fads so not a fair comparison. Either way good to see the misfit spirit lives on.