Media Watch slams changes to TV code favouring advertisers, dubs ACMA a ‘watchpuss’
Media Watch host Paul Barry has questioned the need for a television regulator and described the media watchdog as a “watchpuss” after a large number of restrictions on free-to-air broadcasters were scrapped.
The ABC host’s criticism of changes to the Television Code of Practice comes at the same time as the Australian Association of National Advertisers has welcomed the changes to the codes governing broadcasters.
Barry has filleted the new code launched by the Australian Media and Communications Authority last week, concluding that the broadcasting watchdog had “rolled over” in the face of pressure from Free TV to loosen regulations.
During Monday night’s show Barry took an extensive look at changes in the code, noting that the requirements for identifying advertising had been changed, moving away from transparency for viewers needing to know if shows had been paid for by advertisers.
Just a point that there was no requirement for current affairs programs to be impartial in the old code. It’s just that the new code emphasises the point that CA programs DO NOT need to be impartial.
Is this good social change? Not from where I sit..
Love the new code saying that only complaints from people who watched programs as they went to air will be counted. That is hilarious.
How many lunches did it take for ACMA to roll over on every one?
That’s a bit hypocritical. A few months ago I complained to the ABC about them posting a viciously homophobic episode of Monday Conference from 1976 on iView, and I asked why the ABC had saved this program in their archives when they destroyed seven years of Countdown and the entire three years of Flashez. I never received a reply.
There are people that still watch the commercial networks? Just wow.
What the new code means is that “current affair” programmes like ACA can in future broadcast episodes such as the one which claimed a western Sydney shopping mall was being “taken over by Asians” without needing to apologise or to take down the offending episode by ACMA ruling ie they do not need to need to do anything now. This example was made clear on Media Watch. But let’s face it. Even the old code lacked bite to take action. When ACA made factual errors they got away with the standby excuse that it was merely “presenting opinion”.
FTA is burying itself in stupid. Fine, hasten your demise.